The decisions are being made in Egypt now.
The 'election of the street' is what 'people power' is all about. Americans have come to believe that only our dog-and-pony-show version of modern elections is the way to express the will of the people.
But the Egyptian citizenry is showing us how mistaken we are.
The truth is that we probably haven't had an honestly conducted and counted national election in the United States since at least 1998 ... possibly even further back in time. The mega-transnational corporate money that has flooded and seeped into every layer, corner and crevice of our body politic has corrupted and tainted our constitutional republic beyond real recognition to any idealistic adherent to "government of the people, by the people and for the people."
Maybe that's part of the reason why many of us are fascinated by the scenes we are seeing out of Cairo, Alexandria and Suez -- ordinary people taking up the challenge to say "enough is enough" and tell their autocratic, militaristic, corporate overlords that it is time for them to go. Americans should have so much gumption ... are we subconsciously embarrassed by the Egyptians willing to take to the streets?
Still at this date we'd rather be willingly fooled by Barack Obama's cotton candy oratory or by the macho bluster of the Koch brothers' corporate 'Tea Party' than take a hard look at the corporate culture and government that controls most of our lives and household finances.
Odds are that most Americans will numbly accede to food and gasoline inflation; millions and millions of corporate dollars subverting elections; increasingly intrusive pat-downs, wire taps and surveillance; more bank bailouts; and the further entrenchment of the plutocrats who control our culture and government -- rather than take up the challenge as have the Tunisians and Egyptians to throw the corporate elite out of power.
James Howard Kunslter elaborates on this thesis below ... and more links to analysis about what developments in Egypt mean for you and me.
Those Panglossians around the USA awaiting something like an election in Egypt are going to be disappointed. What's going on in the streets of Cairo right now is an Egyptian election - minus the American-style trappings of corporate grift, scripted "debates," and polling places that make our elections so satisfying.
Many here in the dreamland of Happy Motoring and Cheez Wiz are asking themselves why President Obama is waffling about the obvious tides of "change" now lapping over the ancient Kingdom on the Nile. How can he not believe in it? Why isn't Mr. O out there in front with a bloody bandage around his head, cheerleading for the street fighters? If you lay aside the subtleties, the answer is simple: nothing beyond the status quo of recent years is good news for America.
For one thing, only people paid to flap their gums on Larry Kudlow's nightly CNBC show, and children under nine years old, believe that anything like "democracy and freedom" will arise out of a street revolt in this region of the world. Sure, the opening acts of an historic event like this bring on mass intoxication that the Shining City or the Kingdom of Heaven or some other ideal disposition of things is at hand. There may even be an intermezzo of civil factional interplay, as we saw in Iran thirty years ago, with figures like Shapour Bakhtiar, Mehdi Bazargan, and Abolhassan Banisadr revolving through the turnstile of politics. It doesn't take long for the turnstile to turn into a meat grinder, and it doesn't take much vision to see all the things that can go wrong when that happens in that part of the world.
Before I go any further, I don't want to be misunderstood by eager misunderstanders. In my view, President Mubarak has about as much chance of sticking around his presidential palace another fortnight as a bluebottle fly has of conducting the next Easter mass at the Vatican. Mubarak's resistance to that message prompts one to wonder: what is it with these old despots that they can't manage some sort of orderly timely transition - even if they handpick the successor dude? There must be a few capable younger replacement despots in a country that large (around 80 million). Why does it always have to come to this?
For the answer to that abiding mystery I can only commend you to the works of Gabriel García Márquez. Who else really knows what winds of confusion blow through the minds of old men in realms of power? But, on the "plus side," as they say in American positive thinking circles, the old bastard did manage to keep the peace for three decades at his end of things in the world's premier political hot-spot. This is truly one of the unsung miracles of the age we're living in. Of course, with Mubarak pulled down, all bets on this would be off.
At the moment, Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohamed ElBaradei, former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a seemingly rational, capable fellow of unquestioned gravitas is angling to replace Mubarak. By declaring his intentions, ElBaradei has already crossed some kind of line in the sand that, under less fateful circumstances, would get his ass tossed in a crocodile pit faster than you could recite an incantation from the Scroll of Thoth. But these are extraordinary moments.
More troubling is ElBaradei's flirtation with the Muslim Brotherhood, a venerable mostly underground opposition with a not altogether trustworthy agenda where the USA, and the OECD West generally, are concerned. Whatever the MB represents - and I don't think even the Arab Desk nerds at the State Department are even quite sure - there's enough chance that it includes mischief like promoting a Sharia state, inciting mischief through Hamas, supporting uprisings in other key Muslim nations, and egging on new, unwelcome disorders in a region that the stability of the world hinges on these days.
The key to all that is oil, of course, and mainly the oil of Saudi Arabia. King Abdullah there is at least 86 years old and in poor health. Crown Prince Sultan, his successor, isn't much younger. If ever a country was ripe for a political flipping it is this shaky kingdom. Everyone from the White House to Foggy Bottom to Langley, Virginia, is probably messing his/her pants this week wondering how much longer the lid can be kept on that joint.
To return to an earlier theme, what should amaze us now in the unraveling of this region, is how remarkable and long the recent era of stability lasted. Meaning, most of all, how reliable those tanker shipments of oil have been moving through the Straits of Hormuz and the Suez Canal to their destinations in the lands of the Crusaders (and their younger kin in the New World). To put it pretty starkly, the so-called developed world can't keep its act together more than a week without that steady mainline on Arabian oil, even though it doesn't represent most of the oil traded in the world. The margins are too thin. There's no wiggle room, really, especially for us, in our kingdom of freeways. We lose ten percent of our oil supply and that's all she wrote for business as usual around here. I'll put it even more starkly: we can't afford to let this shit get out of hand for a New York minute.
But it's not really up to us, no matter how many times Hillary Clinton says "uh," through her tightly pursed lips. And Barack Obama is kicking back like everybody else watching things beyond our control spin out on cable TV. Remember something else: these uproars in the Middle East are only the first stirrings of political reaction to coming scarcity of key world resources, especially grain crops, which have never been in such short supply in modern times. And that part of this problem that isn't due to sheer population overshoot, is almost certainly a result of climate change - which many idiots in the US congress refuse to acknowledge out of sheer tenacious stupidity.
A word or two about last week's State of the Union speech. The platitudes were nearly too painful to bear: techno-magic and a zillion engineering PhDs will keeps us at the zenith of historic wonderfulness. Has anyone been to Youngstown, Ohio, recently? We're so full of shit about ourselves, our true condition, and our prospects, that you can see it through our eyeballs. I did, however, mutter a prayer of thanks that Mr. Obama did not act out the mortifying ritual (first established by R. Reagan) of introducing the various role models, heroes, and exemplars installed up in the gallery. We have enough award shows in this country, and it's the horror-inducing season for it - just as the world is flying apart at the seams.